Applications

Orthogonal Validation of NGS and Long-Read Sequencing

The OhmX™ Platform enhances genomics by resolving uncertain structural variant calls from short- and long-read sequencing, providing clear and confident results.

Nabsys NGS Validation
Nabsys Applications Background

From Candidate to Confirmed: Orthogonal SV Validation with EGM

Electronic Genome Mapping (EGM) simplifies the detection of complex structural variants, overcoming challenges like repeats and duplications in both short- and long-read sequencing. Offering a fast, cost-effective, and genome-wide structural view, EGM helps teams quickly confirm variant calls, moving from "candidate" to "confirmed."

  • Increase confidence: Orthogonal confirmation improves PPV and interpretation for both NGS and LRS pipelines.
  • Resolve structure: Determine event class, size, orientation, and architecture (balanced vs. unbalanced; complex CNVs; repeat expansions).
  • Reduce rework: Clarify structure first, then design one correct targeted assay (PCR or small targeted LRS) only if junction sequence is needed.
  • Align with best practices: Supports industry expectations (e.g., ACMG) for orthogonal confirmation of potentially pathogenic calls.
  • See what sequencing may miss: Detect or disambiguate large and complex events that remain unresolved after NGS/LRS.

EGM Can Add Clarity to the Following Cases

Balanced Rearrangements
Suspected translocations and inversions
Complex CNVs
Duplications with uncertain architecture; templated insertions
Repeat Expansions
Confirm expansions that are longer than short-reads
Ambiguous Breakpoints
Discordant short-read signals or low mappability regions
Conflicting Calls
NGS vs LRS discrepancies; unexpected assemblies
Cytogenetic Triage
Sub-microscopic events missed by karyotype; FISH follow-ups

Why Choose EGM for Orthogonal Validation?

1. Accurate Detection and High Concordance with Long-Read Data

In the white paper, Electronic Genome Mapping for Confirmation of Long Structural Variants, we compare genome-wide SV calls exceeding 5 kb from EGM and PacBio HiFi in HG002. EGM data demonstrates a strong correlation to insertion and deletion calls made by PacBio HiFi. The data demonstrate EGM's precision in confirming PacBio's SV calls with nearly identical size estimates, underscoring its capability as an orthogonal validation method.

Figure 1: Genome-wide SV calls exceeding 5 kb in HG002 from EGM and PacBio HiFi are compared and demonstrate high concordance. Deletion calls are plotted to the left of the green line, insertion calls are plotted on the right.

EGM validation of long-read SV calls visualised in Human Chromosome Explorer (HCE) software. Users can visually inspect genomic coordinates of interest and specific SV calls in HCE.

Figure 2: In a large stretch of Chromosome 8 in HG002, PacBio and EGM both called two deletions and one insertion. The figure shows observed and predicted tag sites, with alignment consistency underscoring EGM's reliability in validating SVs, even in complex genomic regions.
2. Clarification of Ambiguous SV Calls

Some SV calls may be ambiguous due to the complexity of genomic rearrangements, sequencing errors, or challenges in mapping repetitive and GC-rich regions. In these cases, EGM may provide clarity or additional context.

In one example below, EGM identified larger insertions, 33,287 bp, in an instance where only smaller or no SVs were called across PacBio replicates runs of HG002. In this case, EGM confirmed one of the PacBio calls but added additional information about the repetitive nature of the SVs. The pile up of EGM reads (in green) shows the high depth achieved across each region, which gives confidence in the call and provides the resolution of the repetitive motif in the red rectangles.

Figure 3: Triplicate PacBio SV call sets from HG002 were analyzed. An SV call was made in only one of the PacBio runs with two reporting no call. EGM was used to confirm or refute the SV calls. EGM confirmed the SV but also added context by detecting a repetitive motif which may explain the inconsistency of PacBio calls. EGM also estimated a larger insertion size due to the repetitive motif that was mapped.
3. Low-Cost Validation Without Compromising Accuracy

Achieve robust results at a fraction of the cost compared to other orthogonal validation approaches, enabling scalable research and diagnostics.

Compared to PCR + Sanger Sequencing:

EGM eliminates the labor-intensive workflows and size limitations of PCR + Sanger, which are only practical for small SVs (<300–500 bp). While both methods offer low per-sample cost, EGM can validate SVs from 300 bp to megabases—offering far greater range and resolution in a similarly affordable, scalable format.

Compared to Additional Long-Read Sequencing:

Validating SVs by re-sequencing with a second long-read platform is costly and redundant. EGM provides orthogonal confirmation at 3–4x lower cost, while delivering high-resolution breakpoint accuracy without the need for deep re-sequencing or expensive computational analysis.

How It Works

Two cloud-based software pipelines are available on Google Cloud to confirm or clarify structural variants (SVs) that require orthogonal validation. To evaluate a candidate SV, users can conduct EGM analysis on the OhmX Platform, then upload the resulting data to one or both pipelines for further analysis.

The first pipeline, Human Chromosome Explorer (HCE), performs de novo genome assembly and genome-wide SV calling, delivering a comprehensive set of SV calls. Users can manually compare their candidate SV with HCE's output to confirm the SV or gain additional insights into the structure of the SV.

The second option is the SV Verify pipeline, which employs read-based mapping using a user-defined putative SV list. This pipeline specifically confirms or refutes the presence of the SV in the designated area.

Empower Your Research with Confidence

Accurate, reliable, and cost-efficient validation is just a step away. Discover how our cutting-edge technology can transform the way you approach SV analysis.

  1. Richards S, Aziz N, et al. ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30.

Our Products

The state-of-the-art OhmX Platform uses electronic nano-detectors to deliver the highest resolution for whole genome structural variant analysis. You can now perform whole genome analysis of SVs down to 300bp in size—enabling insights into previously undetectable DNA variations.

Learn More
OhmX Platform

Ask an expert how you can get the most with the OhmX platform.